View the Full Case Study Here


  • A UK Steel producer was implementing a modification to their passive transfer system (Kick-Out Roll), to help improve the efficiency of their operations. A high water containing hydraulic fluid was chosen to be used, however, this fluid was causing:
    • Delays with the Kick-Out Roll
    • Lost coils
  • As a result the steel producer was interested in changing to a hydraulic fluid to eliminate these issues.


The steel producer replaced their high water containing (80% water, viscosity 46 cSt) hydraulic fluid with QUINTOLUBRIC® 888-46 fully synthetic HFD-U hydraulic fluid.

Both hydraulic fluids are classified as fire resistant hydraulic fluids. However the previous fluid contains 80% water, QUINTOLUBRIC® 888-46 is fully synthetic ester based and contains no water

Since the system was changed to QUINTOLUBRIC® 888-46:

  • The reliability of the passive transfer system (Kick-Out Roll) have improved with a 65% decrease in delays directly related to the QUINTOLUBRIC® fluid in use
  • There have been no lost coils
  • In addition to the savings the system was far less maintenance intensive – only one pump failure that was already worn from the previous high water content fluid in use
  • No other components on the system (other than filters as scheduled) have needed to be changed
  • The conversion to QUINTOLUBRIC® 888-46 has supported the system running 24/7. If the equipment is not functioning correctly, the mill slows down which can result in potential losses up to 10k tonnes per week
  • The density of QUINTOLUBRIC® 888-46 is 10% lower compared to the water based product, making the energy savings at least 10%

View the Full Case Study Here

Google Translate translations are only machine translations, and may not be accurate. Quaker Chemical assumes no responsibility for the accuracy, reliability, or timeliness of the translated information.


Select language from the drop down below


I Agree. Proceed.